Garmin released two new entry-level running watches, but their pricing undercuts their appeal in a crowded market.
The new models join Garmin's stable of fitness trackers aimed at runners who want GPS capabilities without premium pricing. Entry-level running watches typically cost $150 to $300, a sweet spot for casual athletes tracking distance, pace, and heart rate data.
Garmin's strategy has always centered on durability and battery life. The company's watches run for days or weeks on a single charge, unlike smartwatches from Apple or Garmin's premium lines that need daily charging. This matters for runners logging long training weeks who don't want to babysit their device.
The problem: comparable alternatives exist at lower price points. Coros offers solid GPS watches under $200. Amazfit delivers similar features for even less. Even budget-friendly options from Fitbit and Polar provide core running metrics without breaking the bank.
For these new Garmin entries to justify their cost, they'd need standout features. That might mean exceptional GPS accuracy, specialized running metrics like VO2 max estimation, or training plans built directly into the watch. The Lifehacker review suggests the new models lack compelling differentiators.
Runner buying a first GPS watch faces a genuine choice now. Garmin's reputation for reliability holds value. Their ecosystem integrates smoothly with Strava and other fitness apps. But price-conscious athletes shouldn't assume brand loyalty alone justifies spending extra.
If you're shopping for an entry-level running watch, compare these new Garmin models directly against Coros and Amazfit options at similar price points. Check what training features you actually need before paying premium dollars for brand recognition. The best watch isn't always the most expensive one.